I did. I did the end of many blogger moms. I wrote a book .
more correct to say, I picked up some blog posts epidural in a small tome of about 192 pages.
300 copies. Very few. Without distribution, or sold only on the Internet.
to convince me it was John, "naturalist" (forgive the reductive synthesis) and supporter of home birth and my friend. It believes that a different opinion can only do good to all.
As night the baby slept, my mother passed back to sieve the old blog post, I chose some, others trashed it. Retouched Italian as he could, and place them in a single file.
When the "book" takes shape, size and contents (as a first bibliography) to send him a disproportionate number of publishing houses. And Ivan Cavicchi.
I had just finished reading his book, Silent The privatization of health as a right, the woman's body mistreated, ignored his pain), Professor Cavill has thrown me and showed me something more.
The LEA (Essential Levels of Assistance), the acronym that filled my mouth (the epidural should be in the LEA, Turkish Livia had put in the LEA, the LEA, the LEA) suddenly left me a take taste in the mouth. From sweet to 'na crap. Because the basic level these blessed are attached to the financial shift funds. And if there is no money there are no levels. And the care and essential services to citizens without the blessed money, simply disappear.
disappear from the LEA but not rare diseases, not pain during childbirth and a number of flaws affecting a more or less generous slice of the population.
Professor Cavicchi says.
He answers with an enthusiasm that almost makes me wonder. I send him a draft on paper. And the law. And when I go to Rome in February at the conference The pain in women Indeed, choosing the proposal less greedy and more compatible with my lower and middle income.
Epidural por favor
not speak properly of epidural catheters and boluses. Talk about pain in childbirth. But not only. Inside there are some posts about breastfeeding forced breast sull'OMS / WHO and its fixed ( minimum 5 maximum 15% of caesareans
) then reprocessed (in 2009 the WHO / WHO has recognized that a fixed percentage Caesarean may be universalemnte tax) on home birth, on the origins of
water birth. Book reviews. Direct and indirect testimonies of women. It 's a book to me over that dates back more di un anno fa. Ho voluto (meglio, ho torvato la forza di inserire... perchè il libro mi è costata una fatica immane) aggiungere le ritrattazioni dell'OMS sul 15% di cesarei e, cosa più imporatante, il post sulla pataostericia .
Perchè in questi due anni
c'è un dubbio che spesso mi assale. Il desiderio di umanizzazione del parto resta inascoltato dai sanitari, dalle regioni, dall'Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Ci annegano in un mare (torbido) di linee guida, di leggi e normative disattese. E allora le donne cercano altrove. E barattano i loro diritti (accesso paritario alle cure antalgiche, sicurezza, rispetto) con i sogni.
E i sogni son desideri
canticchiava qualcuno . Desidero un parto bello, un parto orgasmico, un parto empowerizzante, un parto in casa, in acqua.
Che poi non ci sia nulla che mi possa salvare da un'emorragia,
che non ci sia nessuno che possa assistere mio figlio cianotico, che il personale sanitario non sia abituato a fronteggiare un'emergenza osterica,
che molte tecniche "
antalgiche
(il corsivetto è d'obbligo) non farmacologiche" non abbiano nessun fondamento scientifico
tutto questo non ha importanza. Desidero e tanto mi basta, perchè desiderando esisto.
Ma le donne
- forse - dovrebbero iniziare to wonder where (and why) do these desires. and my book would be a very humble and goffissimo food for thought.
0 comments:
Post a Comment